5 Ways to Get Your Initiative off the Ground
You’ve been here before. A great idea, a well thought through cost projection and a host of anticipated benefits – but the idea fails to secure the support of the senior team. So, what happened?
Click to Download the full Article
1. Asking people to agree to something new is the same as asking people to change
It’s tempting to start work on your initiative after you have gained the support of the senior team. Often this will be too late and your initiative will either be opposed or diluted to such an extent that it no longer delivers what you intended. However, if you adopt the perspective that what you are fundamentally asking people to do is ‘change’ then you can configure your approach accordingly. John Kotter’s ‘eight steps to successful change’, provides a clear pathway to follow, so before launching your initiative ensure that you have already laid the foundations for successful change by letting Kotter’s change process guide you. Download our full article and take our questionnaire to find out whether you have adopted a change mindset when seeking support for your latest initiative.
2. You can never communicate too much
A critical success factor in every stage of Kotter’s model is communication. Communicating widely will leverage success however it is important to communicate continually and consistently so that you have an existing network to tap into. There is a risk of being perceived as a political animal if you only communicate when trying to push your own agenda. Maintain relationships by communicating with people frequently and valuing their input. Listen carefully to people’s concerns and position yourself appropriately – this will help you influence the critics in the future and give you the information you need to handle difficult or controversial questions. Be informed about who holds positional power and autonomy in decision making but also seek out those people with personal power and strong influencing skills.
3. Organisations and individuals exist within an emotional and psychological landscape
A senior team may act as a single entity but it will be characterised by a highly diverse set of agendas, motivations, interests and personalities. Consciously addressing the senior team as a group of ‘individuals’ with different learning styles and demonstrating understanding of what is important to each of them will increase levels of engagement. For a visual person, try conjuring up images. Talk to those people who are more auditory and appeal to people with a kinaesthetic style by getting them physically involved. Change is highly emotive and may trigger deeply embedded individual mentalities, such as fear, loss and lack of trust - left unrecognised and unaddressed these hidden barriers to change will be significant. It is worth remembering that the organisation also has a personality with history, memories and attachments.
The extent to which your initiative conflicts with the personality of the organisation will determine the extent of the challenge you face.
4. Conflict is necessary for change
Some degree of conflict is likely in most interactions. When proposing a change you will almost certainly experience conflict. There is value in preparing a positive mental model about what conflict is, how you can respond and how conflict can be beneficial. This positive reframing of conflict will also help you facilitate conflicts that occur between others. The Thomas Kilmann conflict model demonstrates that highly assertive and highly co-operative people will be collaborative thereby expanding options and achieving win-win outcomes; these are the perfect conditions for moving your initiative forward positively and for the long term. Managing your own levels of assertiveness and co-operation will largely regulate the response you engender in others. At Notion we have coined the phrase ‘creative tension’ to capture the spirit of the intention of that conflict.
5. Decisions are multi-faceted
Understanding how people arrive at decisions will help you gain understanding and agreement. If you provide information in a way that makes most sense to them, they will be more susceptible to your proposal. To do this effectively it is worth understanding their decision making style.
For example, if you are addressing a manager who has a low tolerance for ambiguity and has a rational way of thinking, they are likely to be efficient and logical and make decisions fast. In these instances, it is important to get your message across quickly and concisely by providing context and clarity from the outset. But, if the highly rational manager also has a high tolerance for ambiguity, they will be more careful in decision-making, so it is beneficial to provide these managers with projections, facts and figures to help them arrive at decisions.
Managers with a very broad outlook will prefer to focus on the long term and enjoy looking for alternatives. Engage these creatives by involving them in a process of ‘design’ and reflect their ideas back to them in your dialogue. The friendly face in the room is likely to have a behavioural approach to decision making. They will be keen to listen to your proposal and be receptive to your ideas. These managers are good advocates but will have a high need for consensus, so don’t rest on your laurels - to win these managers over it’s important to get others on board too.
Taking a blended and agile approach will increase the chances of success when getting your initiative off the ground. Remember to prepare for the idiosyncrasies of your senior team, communicate (a lot), notice and respond to subtle but critical emotional and psychological responses, and embrace conflict as a vehicle to mobilise effective decision making.